4.8 Article

The channel catfish genome sequence provides insights into the evolution of scale formation in teleosts

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11757

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) [2009-35205-05101, 2010-65205-20356, 2012-67015-19410]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Animal Genomics, Genetics, and Breeding Program [2015-67015-22907]
  3. USDA Agricultural Research Service [CRIS 6402-31000-009-00D]
  4. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate (DHS/ST) [HSHQDC-07-C-00020]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [1023403] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. ARS [813664, ARS-0428060] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Catfish represent 12% of teleost or 6.3% of all vertebrate species, and are of enormous economic value. Here we report a high-quality reference genome sequence of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), the major aquaculture species in the US. The reference genome sequence was validated by genetic mapping of 54,000 SNPs, and annotated with 26,661 predicted protein-coding genes. Through comparative analysis of genomes and transcriptomes of scaled and scaleless fish and scale regeneration experiments, we address the genomic basis for the most striking physical characteristic of catfish, the evolutionary loss of scales and provide evidence that lack of secretory calcium-binding phosphoproteins accounts for the evolutionary loss of scales in catfish. The channel catfish reference genome sequence, along with two additional genome sequences and transcriptomes of scaled catfishes, provide crucial resources for evolutionary and biological studies. This work also demonstrates the power of comparative subtraction of candidate genes for traits of structural significance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available