4.8 Article

Wave-induced loss of ultra-relativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12883

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Association Recruiting Imitative programme
  2. NASA [NNX16AF91G, NNX13AE34G, NNX10AK99G, NNX15AI94G, NNX16AG78G, NNX16AF85G]
  3. RBSP-ECT through JHU/APL contract under NASA [967399, NAS5-01072]
  4. JHU/APL contract [922613]
  5. NSF [GEM AGS-1203747]
  6. UC Lab Fee grant [12-LR-235337]
  7. EU [637302]
  8. International Space Science Institute (Bern)
  9. NASA [NNX16AG78G, 904178] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  10. Directorate For Geosciences
  11. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1203747] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  13. Directorate For Geosciences [1341493] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dipole configuration of the Earth's magnetic field allows for the trapping of highly energetic particles, which form the radiation belts. Although significant advances have been made in understanding the acceleration mechanisms in the radiation belts, the loss processes remain poorly understood. Unique observations on 17 January 2013 provide detailed information throughout the belts on the energy spectrum and pitch angle (angle between the velocity of a particle and the magnetic field) distribution of electrons up to ultra-relativistic energies. Here we show that although relativistic electrons are enhanced, ultra-relativistic electrons become depleted and distributions of particles show very clear telltale signatures of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave-induced loss. Comparisons between observations and modelling of the evolution of the electron flux and pitch angle show that electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves provide the dominant loss mechanism at ultra-relativistic energies and produce a profound dropout of the ultra-relativistic radiation belt fluxes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available