4.8 Article

De novo genic mutations among a Chinese autism spectrum disorder cohort

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13316

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB517900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81330027, 81525007, 31400919]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570684]
  4. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2016CX038]
  5. Young Talent Lifts Project of CAST
  6. China Scholarship Council [201406370028]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012zzts110]
  8. Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative [SFARI 303241]
  9. NIH [R01MH101221]
  10. NHGRI Interdisciplinary Training in Genome Science Grant [T32HG00035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recurrent de novo (DN) and likely gene-disruptive (LGD) mutations contribute significantly to autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) but have been primarily investigated in European cohorts. Here, we sequence 189 risk genes in 1,543 Chinese ASD probands (1,045 from trios). We report an 11-fold increase in the odds of DN LGD mutations compared with expectation under an exome-wide neutral model of mutation. In aggregate, similar to 4% of ASD patients carry a DN mutation in one of just 29 autism risk genes. The most prevalent gene for recurrent DN mutations is SCN2A (1.1% of patients) followed by CHD8, DSCAM, MECP2, POGZ, WDFY3 and ASH1L. We identify novel DN LGD recurrences (GIGYF2, MYT1L, CUL3, DOCK8 and ZNF292) and DN mutations in previous ASD candidates (ARHGAP32, NCOR1, PHIP, STXBP1, CDKL5 and SHANK1). Phenotypic follow-up confirms potential subtypes and highlights how large global cohorts might be leveraged to prove the pathogenic significance of individually rare mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available