4.8 Article

Taotie neurons regulate appetite in Drosophila

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13633

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB825504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91232720, 31070925]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [GJHZ201302, QYZDY-SSW-SMC015]
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1119434]
  5. 100-Talents Program of CAS
  6. Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS [XDB02040002]
  7. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - Grand Challenges Explorations Initiative [OPP1119434] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1119434] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The brain has an essential role in maintaining a balance between energy intake and expenditure of the body. Deciphering the processes underlying the decision-making for timely feeding of appropriate amounts may improve our understanding of physiological and psychological disorders related to feeding control. Here, we identify a group of appetite-enhancing neurons in a behavioural screen for flies with increased appetite. Manipulating the activity of these neurons, which we name Taotie neurons, induces bidirectional changes in feeding motivation. Long-term stimulation of Taotie neurons results in flies with highly obese phenotypes. Furthermore, we show that the in vivo activity of Taotie neurons in the neuroendocrine region reflects the hunger/satiety states of un-manipulated animals, and that appetitive-enhancing Taotie neurons control the secretion of insulin, a known regulator of feeding behaviour. Thus, our study reveals a new set of neurons regulating feeding behaviour in the high brain regions that represents physiological hunger states and control feeding behaviour in Drosophila.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available