4.7 Review

Which high-risk HPV assays fulfil criteria for use in primary cervical cancer screening?

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 817-826

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.04.015

Keywords

Cervical cancer; cervical cancer screening; diagnostic test accuracy; human papillomavirus; meta-analysis; systematic review; validation of tests

Funding

  1. European Commission through the COHEAHR Network [603019]
  2. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (Bilthoven, the Netherlands)
  3. German Guideline Program in Oncology (German Cancer Aid project) [110163]
  4. Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (Brussels, Belgium)
  5. Dutch Cancer Society [KWF2007-3771, KWF2009-4413, KWF2009-4522, KWF2010-4668]
  6. Zorgonderzoek Nederland-Medische Wetenschappen (ZON-MW)
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [2012-AdG, 322986]
  8. Abbott
  9. Hologic
  10. Cepheid
  11. Becton Dickinson

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several countries are in the process of switching to high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing for cervical cancer screening. Given the multitude of available tests, validated assays which assure high-quality screening need to be identified. A systematic review was conducted to answer the question which hrHPV tests fulfil the criteria defined by an international expert team in 2009, based on reproducibility and relative sensitivity and specificity compared to Hybrid Capture-2 or GP5+16+ PCR enzyme immunoassay. These latter two hrHPV DNA assays were validated in large randomized trials and cohorts with a follow-up duration of 8 years or more. Eligible studies citing the 2009 guideline were retrieved from Scopus (http://www.scopus.com) and from a meta-analysis assessing the relative accuracy of new hrHPV assays versus the standard comparator tests to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer in primary screening. The cobas 4800 HPV test and Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test were consistently validated in two and three studies, respectively, whereas the PapilloCheck HPV-screening test, BD Onclarity HPV assay and the HPV-Risk assay were validated each in one study. Other tests which partially fulfil the 2009 guidelines are the following Cervista HPV HR Test, GP5+/6+ PCR-LMNX, an in-house E6/E7 RT quantitative PCR and MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight). The APTIMA HPV assay targeting E6/E7 mRNA of hrHPV was also fully validated. However, the cross-sectional equivalency criteria of the 2009 guidelines were set up for HPV DNA assays. Demonstration of a low risk of CIN3+ after a negative APTIMA test over a longer period is awaited to inform us about its utility in cervical cancer screening at 5-year or longer intervals. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2015 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available