4.4 Article

Effect of MUC1/β-catenin interaction on the tumorigenic capacity of pancreatic CD133+ cells

Journal

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 1811-1817

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4888

Keywords

pancreatic cancer; MUC1; cancer stem cells; cell signaling

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the fact that the biological function of cluster of differentiation (CD) 133 remains unclear, this glycoprotein is currently used in the identification and isolation of tumor-initiating cells from certain malignant tumors, including pancreatic cancer. In the present study, the involvement of mucin 1 (MUC1) in the signaling pathways of a highly tumorigenic CD133(+) cellular subpopulation sorted from the pancreatic cancer cell line HPAF-II was evaluated. The expression of MUC1-cytoplasmic domain (MUC1-CD) and oncogenic signaling transducers (epidermal growth factor receptor, protein kinase C delta, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta and growth factor receptor-bound protein 2), as well as the association between MUC1 and beta-catenin, were characterized in HPAF-II CD133(+) and CD133(low) cell subpopulations and in tumor xenografts generated from these cells. Compared with HPAF CD133(low) cells, HPAF-II CD133(+) cancer cells exhibited increased tumorigenic potential in immunocompromised mice, which was associated with overexpression of MUC1 and with the accordingly altered expression profile of MUC1-associated signaling partners. Additionally, MUC1-CD/beta-catenin interactions were increased both in the HPAF-II CD133(+) cell subpopulation and derived tumor xenografts compared with HPAF CD133(low) cells. These results suggest that, in comparison with HPAF CD133(low) cells, CD133(+) cells exhibit higher expression of MUC1, which contributes to their tumorigenic phenotype through increased interaction between MUC1-CD and beta-catenin, which in turn modulates oncogenic signaling cascades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available