4.4 Review

Pathogenesis of the intravertebral vacuum of Kummell's disease (Review)

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 879-882

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3369

Keywords

compression fractures; Kummell's disease; osteoporotic vertebral vertebral body; intravertebral vacuum; pathogenesis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health Science and Technology of China [W2013ZT183]
  2. Zhejiang Medical Research Foundation of China [2014-KYB315, 2016KYA200]
  3. Zhejiang Science and Technology Program Foundation of China [2016C33245]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, we explored the progress of the pathogenesis of Kummell's disease intravertebral vacuum. Using different expressions of the same disease including 'Kummell's disease', 'avascular necrosis after vertebral compression fracture (VCF)', 'post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis', 'vertebral pseudarthrosis', 'intravertebral vacuum (cleft or gas)', 'delayed vertebral collapse', 'VCF nonunion', and by conducting a search of the PubMed database, we analyzed the results to examine the pathogenesis of the intravertebral vacuum of Kummell's disease after referring to pertinent literature on intravertebral vacuum of ischemic necrosis after VCF, and exploring the progress of pathogenesis of this disease. A number of discrepancies were identified within the pathogenesis of the intravertebral vacuum after VCF. There were statements such as avascular necrosis of the vertebral body, bone biomechanics, gas forming and other types of claims, all of which obtained clinical and biomechanical supporting evidence. Collectively, most of the researchers believe that Kummell vertebral fracture syndrome was the comprehensive effect of multiple factors including osteoporosis, avascular necrosis of the vertebral body, and biomechanical changes following fracture. However, there are a number of discrepancies to be resolved and future studies are therefore needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available