4.7 Article

3 or 3′-Galloyl substitution plays an important role in association of catechins and theaflavins with porcine pancreatic α-amylase: The kinetics of inhibition of α-amylase by tea polyphenols

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 144-156

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.07.012

Keywords

Tea polyphenols; alpha-Amylase; Inhibition; Kinetics; Galloyl moiety

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls [CE110001007]
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/F/00044425] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inhibitory activities of three tea extracts (TEs) and individual phenolic compounds in TEs against porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase (PPA) were studied by measuring their half inhibitory (IC50) concentrations. The kinetics of inhibition by these extracts and compounds were investigated through Dixon, Cornish-Bowden, and Lineweaver-Burk plots. The results showed that green, oolong and black tea extracts, epigallocatechin gallate, theaflavin-3, 3'-digallate and tannic acid were competitive inhibitors of PPA, whereas epicatechin gallate, theaflavin-3'-gallate and theaflavin were mixed-type inhibitors with both competitive and uncompetitive inhibitory characteristics. Only catechins with a galloyl substituent at the 3-position showed measurable inhibition. The competitive inhibition constants (Ku) were lower for theaflavins than catechins, with the lowest value for theaflavin-3, 3'-digallate. The lower than the uncompetitive inhibition constant for the mixed-type inhibitors suggests that they bind more tightly with free PPA than with the PPA-starch complex. A 3 and/or 3'-galloyl moiety in catechin and theaflavin structures was consistently found to increase inhibition of PPA through enhanced association with the enzyme active site. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available