4.7 Article

Isolation and characterization of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from Ulva rigida C. Agardh protein hydrolysate

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 65-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.07.006

Keywords

Macroalgae; Enzymatic hydrolysis; ACE-inhibitory peptides; Inhibition kinetic; Simulated gastrointestinal digestion; Hypertension

Funding

  1. CIRN (Centro de Investigacao de Recursos Naturais, University of the Azores)
  2. cE3c funding [UID/BIN00329/2013]
  3. FRC (Fundo Regional da Gienca) [M3.1.2/F/014/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ulva rigida protein was hydrolysed with pepsin plus bromelain after a screening of nine enzymes for optimal proteolysis. This hydrolysate, presenting ACE-inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of 0.483 mg/mL, was fractionated by ultrafiltration membranes into three molecular weight ranges (<1 kDa, 1-3 kDa and >3 kDa). The <1 kDa fraction that exhibited the highest activity (IC50: 0.095 mg/mL) was purified using size-exclusion chromatography and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, yielding two active ACE inhibitory purified peptides. Edman degradation revealed its amino acid sequences to be IP and AFL with ICso values of 0.020 and 0.023 mg/mL, respectively. Both peptides were synthesized to confirm the structure and to validate their ACE-inhibitory activities. Lineweaver-Burk plots suggest that IP acts as a non-competitive and AFL as a competitive ACE-inhibitors. Stability assays showed that both peptides are heat-stable and AFL is hydrolysed by intestinal mucosa peptidases to FL with IC50 value of 0.004 mg/mL that acts as a non-competitive ACE-inhibitor. The results suggest that these peptides might have a potential use in the preparation of antihypertensive drugs or functional foods. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available