4.7 Article

Lipid droplet levels vary heterogeneously in response to simulated gastrointestinal stresses in different probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 193-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.12.013

Keywords

Saccharomyces cerevisiae var boulardii; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Probiotics; Lipid droplets; Gastrointestinal tract stresses; Stress resistance

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (CNPq
  2. Brasilia, DF, Brazil)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil)
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil)
  5. Fondazione RiMED (Palermo, PA, Italy)
  6. FAPERJ Cientistas do Nosso Estado grant
  7. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To exert their therapeutic action, probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains must survive harsh digestive environments. Lipid droplets accumulate in cells which undergo stress-inducing situations, supposedly having a protective role. We assessed lipid droplet levels, either naturally accumulated or induced in response to digestive challenges, of probiotic strains S. boulardii, S. cerevisiae A-905, S. cerevisiae Sc47 and S. cerevisiae L11, and of non-probiotic strains S. cerevisiae BY4741 and S. cerevisiae BY4743. Strains 905 and Sc47 had lower and higher lipid droplet levels, respectively, when compared to the remaining strains, showing that higher accumulation of these neutral lipids is not a feature shared by all probiotic Saccharomyces strains. When submitted to simulated gastric or bile salts environments, lipid droplet levels increase in all tested probiotic strains, at least for one to the induced stresses, suggesting that lipid droplets participate in the protective mechanisms against gastrointestinal stresses in probiotic Saccharomyces yeasts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available