4.6 Article

Effect of MK-801 and Clozapine on the Proteome of Cultured Human Oligodendrocytes

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00052

Keywords

glial cells; oligodendrocyte; proteomics; schizophrenia; pharmacology; clozapine; MK801

Categories

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [13/08711-3, 14/21035-0, 14/14881-1, 14/10068-4]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [460289/2014-4]
  3. Research Fund (FAEPEX) from University of Campinas [0986/14]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [14/21035-0, 14/14881-1, 13/08711-3, 14/10068-4] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Separate lines of evidence have demonstrated the involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and oligodendrocyte dysfunctions in schizophrenia. Here, we have carried out shotgun mass spectrometry proteome analysis of oligodendrocytes treated with the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 to gain potential insights into these effects at the molecular level. The MK-801 treatment led to alterations in the levels of 68 proteins, which are associated with seven distinct biological processes. Most of these proteins are involved in energy metabolism and many have been found to be dysregulated in previous proteomic studies of post-mortem brain tissues from schizophrenia patients. Finally, addition of the antipsychotic clozapine to MK-801 treated oligodendrocyte cultures resulted in changes in the levels of 45 proteins and treatment with clozapine alone altered 122 proteins and many of these showed opposite changes to the MK-801 effects. Therefore, these proteins and the associated energy metabolism pathways should be explored as potential biomarkers of antipsychotic efficacy. In conclusion, MK-801 treatment of oligodendrocytes may provide a useful model for testing the efficacy of novel treatment approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available