Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 91-102Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.12356
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- European Commission [KBBE-211684]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Resistance to semi-dry environments has been considered a crucial trait for superior growth and survival of strains used for bioaugmentation in contaminated soils. In order to compare water stress programmes, we analyse differential gene expression among three phylogenetically different strains capable of aromatic compound degradation: Arthrobacter chlorophenolicusA6, Sphingomonas wittichiiRW1 and Pseudomonas veronii1YdBTEX2. Standardized laboratory-induced water stress was imposed by shock exposure of liquid cultures to water potential decrease, induced either by addition of solutes (NaCl, solute stress) or by addition of polyethylene glycol (matric stress), both at absolute similar stress magnitudes and at those causing approximately similar decrease of growth rates. Genome-wide differential gene expression was recorded by micro-array hybridizations. Growth of P.veronii1YdBTEX2 was the most sensitive to water potential decrease, followed by S.wittichiiRW1 and A.chlorophenolicusA6. The number of genes differentially expressed under decreasing water potential was lowest for A.chlorophenolicusA6, increasing with increasing magnitude of the stress, followed by S.wittichiiRW1 and P.veronii1YdBTEX2. Gene inspection and gene ontology analysis under stress conditions causing similar growth rate reduction indicated that common reactions among the three strains included diminished expression of flagellar motility and increased expression of compatible solutes (which were strain-specific). Furthermore, a set of common genes with ill-defined function was found between all strains, including ABC transporters and aldehyde dehydrogenases, which may constitute a core conserved response to water stress. The data further suggest that stronger reduction of growth rate of P.veronii1YdBTEX2 under water stress may be an indirect result of the response demanding heavy NADPH investment, rather than the presence or absence of a suitable stress defence mechanism per se.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available