4.8 Article

Ultrahigh performance supercapacitors utilizing core-shell nanoarchitectures from a metal-organic framework-derived nanoporous carbon and a conducting polymer

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 5704-5713

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6sc01429a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hitherto, many reports on composite materials for electrochemical applications are based on one-dimensional carbon nanotubes or two-dimensional graphene materials. However, these composite materials usually suffer from a stacking problem during electrochemical cycling. A smart nanoarchitectural design is needed for composite materials in order to overcome this problem. Recent research on electrochemical energy storage (EES) applications has focused on the development of three-dimensional (3-D) core-shell structures. The basis for high performance electrochemical energy storage is to control the efficient intercalation of ions in such a 3-D structure. Here, we demonstrate controlled synergy between the physicochemical properties of nanoporous carbon and conducting polyaniline polymer (carbon-PANI), which leads to some new interesting electrochemical properties. The time-dependent controlled optimization of the core-shell nanocomposites consisting of nanoporous carbon with a thin layer of PANI nanorod arrays gives useful control over supercapacitor performance. Furthermore, these carbon-PANI nanocomposites can electrochemically access ions with remarkable efficiency to achieve a capacitance value in the range of 300-1100 F g(-1). When assembled in a two electrode cell configuration, the symmetric supercapacitor (SSC) based on carbon-PANI//carbon-PANI shows the highest specific energy of 21 W h kg(-1) and the highest specific power of 12 kW kg(-1). More interestingly, the SSC shows capacitance retention of 86% after 20 000 cycles, which is highly superior compared to previous research reports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available