4.8 Article

The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 3869-3878

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6sc00264a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Bristol
  2. Research and Enterprise Development group
  3. Elizabeth Blackwell University Research Institute
  4. Royal Society of Chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a summary of the National Compound Collection (NCC) pilot; which harvested chemical structure data from 746 publicly-available PhD theses to create an enhanced database of diverse and interesting (largely organic) molecular entities. The database comprised similar to 75 000 structure entries, of which 70% were new to ChemSpider at the time of upload. The dataset was evaluated for structural uniqueness by twelve external drug discovery groups from the pharmaceutical, biotech, academic and not-for-profit sectors. These partners generated data reported here comparing the NCC pilot with their in-house compound collections. The proportion of NCC structures considered to be useful for drug discovery ranged from 5-80% depending on the strictness of the filters used; most interestingly from a drug discovery standpoint similar to 13k NCC compounds (18% of the NCC) passed the filters and were of good diversity. These compounds are quite different from those that are already present in the screening collections but not so different that they are no longer considered to be drug-like. In general, the drug discovery teams would consider these compounds to be high value molecules for inclusion in their screening collections. This pilot addressed the potential value of unpublished data and explored the practicalities of large-scale data extraction, to inform both retrospective and prospective extraction of chemical data from theses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available