4.8 Article

A colour-tunable chiral AIEgen: reversible coordination, enantiomer discrimination and morphology visualization

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 6106-6114

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6sc01614f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB834701]
  2. University Grants Committee of Hong Kong [AoE/P-03/08]
  3. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [16301614, 16305014, N_HKUST604/14]
  4. Innovation and Technology Commission [ITC-CNERC14SC01]
  5. Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program of China [201101C0105067115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a conceptually new approach to synthesise a boron-containing Aggregation-Induced Emissive Luminogen (AIEgen) with a chiral chromophore. An intramolecular N-B coordinating bond results in a low-energy transition that renders the material red-emissive in a solid state. By competitive binding of nucleophiles to the boron atom, this bond is replaced in favour of an intermolecular coordinating bond, which results in a tremendous blue-shift in both the absorption and emission. A supportive DFT computation elucidates that a breakage of the intramolecular N-B coordinating bond causes a tremendous loss of conjugation in the LUMO, resulting in a larger energy gap. Owing to the fact that our scaffold is intrinsically chiral and Lewis-acidic, we demonstrate how our AIEgen discriminates between two pairs of enantiomers in a simple UV-vis measurement. Furthermore, the binding capabilities are exploited to stain polymer blends that comprised a non-coordinating and a Lewis-basic polymer. The red fluorescence that originates only from domains of the non-coordinating polymer is conveniently detected by a fluorescence microscope. Thus, compared to current analytical methods, we present a cheaper and faster methodology to study the micro-morphologies of certain polymer blends.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available