4.4 Article

Optimal configurations of full-Stokes polarimeter with immunity to both Poisson and Gaussian noise

Journal

JOURNAL OF OPTICS
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2040-8978/18/5/055702

Keywords

polarimetry; polarimetric imaging; polarization-selective devices

Categories

Funding

  1. China Scholarship [201406285048]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [xjj2013044]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130201120047]
  4. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2014JQ8362]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41530422, 61275184, 61405153, 61540018]
  6. National Major Project [32-Y30B08-9001-13/15]
  7. 863 Program of China [2012AA121101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For a full-Stokes polarimeter (FSP), generally there are two types of noise, signal-dependent Poisson shot noise and signal-independent additive Gaussian noise, which will degrade the signal-to-noise ratio on the measured Stokes parameters. The relation between the immunity to Gaussian noise and the condition of the measurement matrix has been widely studied in the recent literature. In this paper, we present a new merit function and use it to achieve optimal configurations with immunity to both types of noise. The numerical results show that, for the FSP consisting of variable retarders followed by a fixed polarizer, the four measurement channels immune to these two types of noise can be optimally composed by a 102.2 degrees retardance with a pair of azimuths +/- 71.9 degrees and a 142.1 degrees retardance with a pair of azimuths +/- 34.95 degrees, or by two quarter-wave plates with four pairs of azimuths (+/- 70.15 degrees, +/- 87.84 degrees) and (+/- 42.82 degrees, +/- 19.14 degrees). The tolerances of the retardances or azimuths in the optimized configurations are evaluated for practical manufacturing, assembling and alignment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available