4.2 Article

Assessment of the Effects of Severe Winter Disasters (Dzud) on Public Health in Mongolia on the Basis of Loss of Livestock

Journal

DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 549-552

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2016.5

Keywords

winter disaster; dzud; dryland; infant mortality; livestock

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [25220201]
  2. Assessment and Control of Dust Emission in Degraded Drylands of East Asia (Project Asian Dust), Tottori University
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25870806, 25870447] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Mongolia experienced one of its most severe natural winter disasters (dzud) in 2009-2010. It is difficult to accurately assess the risk of the effects of dzud on human lives and public health. This study aimed to evaluate the Mongolian public health risks of dzud by assessing livestock loss. Methods We analyzed data from all 21 provinces and Ulaanbaatar in Mongolia and compared the changes in infant mortality (2009-2010) and the decline in the numbers of livestock (percentage change from the previous year), which included horses, cattle, camels, sheep, and goats (2009-2010) and/or meteorological data. We also evaluated the association among the trends in the infant mortality rate, the number of livestock, and foodstuff consumption throughout Mongolia (2001-2012). Results The change in the infant mortality rate was positively correlated with the rate of decreasing numbers of each type of livestock in 2010. Average temperature and total precipitation were not related to the change in the infant mortality rate. In the trend from 2001 to 2012, there was a significant positive correlation between the infant mortality rate and the number of livestock and the consumption of milk products. Conclusions Loss of livestock and shortage of milk products leading to malnutrition might have affected public health as typified by infant mortality in Mongolia. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:549-552)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available