4.6 Article

Land use mix and five-year mortality in later life: Results from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study

Journal

HEALTH & PLACE
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 54-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.12.002

Keywords

Land use mix; Neighbourhood; Mortality; Older people

Funding

  1. Department of Health and the Medical Research Council [G9901400]
  2. Medical Research Council [U105292687, MR/K021907/1]
  3. Cambridge Trust, University of Cambridge
  4. ESRC [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G9901400, MR/K023187/1, MR/K021907/1, G0601022] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/K023187/1, G9901400, MR/K021907/1, G0601022] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10084] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the potential modifying effect of age and mediation effect of co-morbidity on the association between land use mix, a measure of neighbourhood walkability, and five-year mortality among the 2424 individuals participating in the year-10 follow-up of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study in England. Postcodes of participants were mapped onto Lower-layer Super Output Areas, a small area level geographical unit in the UK, and linked to Generalised Land Use data. Cox regression models were fitted to investigate the association. For the younger older age group (75-79 years), the effect of high land use mix on an elevated risk of mortality was mediated by co-morbidity. For older old age groups (80-84,85+ years), a higher land use mix was directly associated with a 10% lower risk of five-year mortality. The findings suggest differential impacts of land use mix on the health of the younger and older old. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available