4.4 Article

Testing practices and volume of non-Lyme tickborne diseases in the United States

Journal

TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 193-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.10.005

Keywords

Tickborne disease; Laboratory; Diagnostic testing; Babesiosis; Anaplasmosis

Funding

  1. CDC Cooperative Agreements [5U01C1000307, 5U01C100031005, 5U01C1000313, 5U01C100031004]
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES (NCID) [U01CI000307] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large commercial laboratories in the United States were surveyed regarding the number of specimens tested for eight tickborne diseases in 2008. Seven large commercial laboratories reported testing a total of 2,927,881 specimens nationally (including Lyme disease). Of these, 495,585 specimens (17%) were tested for tickborne diseases other than Lyme disease. In addition to large commercial laboratories, another 1051 smaller commercial, hospital, and government laboratories in four states (CT, MD, MN, and NY) were surveyed regarding tickborne disease testing frequency, practices, and results. Ninety-two of these reported testing a total of 10,091 specimens for four tickborne diseases other than Lyme disease. We estimate the cost of laboratory diagnostic testing for non-Lyme disease tickborne diseases in 2008 to be $9.6 million. These data provide a baseline to evaluate trends in tickborne disease test utilization and insight into the burden of these diseases. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available