4.6 Article

Phylogenetic and Molecular Variability Studies Reveal a New Genetic Clade of Citrus leprosis virus C

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v8060153

Keywords

cilevirus; citrus leprosis; Brevipalpus-transmitted viruses

Categories

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [375843/2012-4, 481771/2013-1, 401564/2012-6]
  2. Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa no Estado de Sao Paulo [2012/18771-0, 2012/20667-7, 2014/08458-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV-C) causes a severe disease affecting citrus orchards in the Western hemisphere. This study reveals the molecular variability of the virus by analyzing four genomic regions (p29, p15, MP and RNA2-intergenic region) distributed over its two RNAs. Nucleotide diversity (pi) values were relatively low but statistically different over the analyzed genes and subpopulations, indicating their distinct evolutionary history. Values of pi(p29) and pi(MP) were higher than those of pi(p15) and pi(RNA2-IR), whereas pi(MP) was increased due to novel discovered isolates phylogenetically clustered in a divergent clade that we called SJP. Isolate BR_SP_SJP_01 RNA1 and RNA2 sequences, clade SJP, showed an identity of 85.6% and 88.4%, respectively, with those corresponding to CiLV-C, the type member of the genus Cilevirus, and its RNA2 5'-proximal region was revealed as a minor donor in a putative inter-clade recombination event. In addition to citrus, BR_SP_SJP_01 naturally infects the weed Commelina benghalensis and is efficiently transmitted by Brevipalpus yothersi mites. Our data demonstrated that negative selection was the major force operating in the evaluated viral coding regions and defined amino acids putatively relevant for the biological function of cilevirus proteins. This work provides molecular tools and sets up a framework for further epidemiological studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available