4.2 Article

Allometric relationships between cutaneous surface area and body mass in anuran amphibians

Journal

ZOOLOGISCHER ANZEIGER
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages 45-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcz.2016.04.007

Keywords

Scaling; Linear regression; Phylogenetic least square regression; Morphology; Amphibia

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [302542/2008-6, 309672/2012-0, 05849/2015-8]
  3. Programa Nacional de Pos-Doutorado (PNPD) of CAPES Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several allometric relationships exist in the literature describing the relationship between surface area (A(S)) and body mass (M-B) for different taxa of Anura and these are frequently used in physiological studies. Here, we gathered literature data of A(S) (cm(2)) and M-B (g), added new original data, and allometric relationships between A(S) and M-B were evaluated using linear and phylogenetic generalized least-square (PGLS) regressions. Data from 453 specimens from 44 species were included. Intraspecific allometric relations between A(S) and M-B were determined for 18 species, with ten of those showing regressions not significantly different from the respective family regression; four species showing a significantly different y-intercept; and three species showing a significantly different slope. Only the families Bufonidae, Ranidae, and Hylidae were represented by several species (9, 11, and 12, respectively) and with larger specimens' numbers (54, 215, and 127, respectively). These three families exhibited significantly different OLS linear regressions on log(10)-transformed data, with Hylidae showing the steepest (0.7735 +/- 0.0110), Bufonidae an intermediate (0.6772 +/- 0.0220), and Ranidae the lowest slope (0.6091 +/- 0.0114). The relationship between A(S) and M-B for Anura could be described by the linear regression A(S) = 9.8537 M-B(0.6745) or by the PGLS regression A(S) = 8.7498 M-B(0.685). (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available