4.5 Article

Use of Calcium and Parathyroid Hormone Nomogram to Distinguish Between Atypical Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Normal Patients

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 122-128

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3716-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism (1A degrees HP) has become more complex, as fewer patients present with classic phenotype of concomitant elevation of calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH). In addition, the distinction between normal versus abnormal patients is challenging, with an increasing number of patients with 1A degrees HP, who have calcium and/or PTH values within the reference range. Patients with inappropriately elevated PTH values relative to their serum calcium are considered to have 1A degrees HP. The study population consisted of 1753 patients with pathologically proven 1A degrees HP and 74 healthy control patients. Nomograms were created by plotting PTH versus calcium of the two groups. The 95 % confidence zone of calcium and PTH for normal individuals was plotted and compared to patients with 1A degrees HP. The comparison of control and disease groups showed a clear demarcation zone on the plots of calcium versus PTH. In the group of 1A degrees HP, 70 % had classic 1A degrees HP presentation with the concomitant elevation of both calcium (10.5 mg/dL) and PTH (65 pg/dL). 21 % had normocalcemic HP with calcium10.5 mg/dL and PTH 65 pg/dL. 6 % had normohormonal HP with calcium 10.5 mg/dL and PTH65 pg/dL. 3 % had both calcium and PTH within the reference range. 68.5 % of patients had single adenoma, 16 % double adenoma, and 15.5 % hyperplasia. This nomogram serves as a diagnostic tool to distinguish normal patients from those with 1A degrees HP, particularly those with atypical presentations. This recognition would permit previously observed patients to benefit from curative surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available