4.5 Review

Polysaccharide degradation systems of the saprophytic bacterium Cellvibrio japonicus

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-016-2068-6

Keywords

Carbohydrate active enzyme; Cellvibrio japonicus; Lignocellulose; Polysaccharide degradation; Saprophyte

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-SC0014183]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0014183] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study of recalcitrant polysaccharide degradation by bacterial systems is critical for understanding biological processes such as global carbon cycling, nutritional contributions of the human gut microbiome, and the production of renewable fuels and chemicals. One bacterium that has a robust ability to degrade polysaccharides is the Gram-negative saprophyte Cellvibrio japonicus. A bacterium with a circuitous history, C. japonicus underwent several taxonomy changes from an initially described Pseudomonas sp. Most of the enzymes described in the pre-genomics era have also been renamed. This review aims to consolidate the biochemical, structural, and genetic data published on C. japonicus and its remarkable ability to degrade cellulose, xylan, and pectin substrates. Initially, C. japonicus carbohydrate-active enzymes were studied biochemically and structurally for their novel polysaccharide binding and degradation characteristics, while more recent systems biology approaches have begun to unravel the complex regulation required for lignocellulose degradation in an environmental context. Also included is a discussion for the future of C. japonicus as a model system, with emphasis on current areas unexplored in terms of polysaccharide degradation and emerging directions for C. japonicus in both environmental and biotechnological applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available