4.6 Article

Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: Current evidence and future perspectives

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 727-735

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.727

Keywords

Gastrectomy; Laparoscopic resection; Early gastric cancer; Stomach neoplasms; Advanced gastric cancer; Minimally invasive surgery

Funding

  1. ETRI R&D Program (The Development of a Realistic Surgery Rehearsal System based on Patient Specific Surgical Planning) - Government of South Korea [14ZC1400]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [14ZC1400] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laparoscopic gastrectomy has been widely accepted as a standard alternative for the treatment of early-stage gastric adenocarcinoma because of its favorable short-term outcomes. Although controversies exist, such as establishing clear indications, proper preoperative staging, and oncologic safety, experienced surgeons and institutions have applied this approach, along with various types of function-preserving surgery, for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. With technical advancement and the advent of state-of-the-art instruments, indications for laparoscopic gastrectomy are expected to expand as far as locally advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopic gastrectomy appears to be promising; however, scientific evidence necessary to generalize this approach to a standard treatment for all relevant patients and care providers remains to be gathered. Several multicenter, prospective randomized trials in high-incidence countries are ongoing, and results from these trials will highlight the short- and long-term outcomes of the approach. In this review, we describe up-to-date findings and critical issues regarding laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available