4.7 Article

Developing Outcomes Assessments as Endpoints for Registrational Clinical Trials of Antibacterial Drugs: 2015 Update From the Biomarkers Consortium of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 603-607

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ927

Keywords

antibacterial drug development; noninferiority trial design; early clinical response; patient-reported outcome; PRO

Funding

  1. Actelion
  2. Basilea
  3. Bayer
  4. Cubist (now Merck)
  5. Medicines Company
  6. Merck
  7. Nabriva
  8. Roche
  9. Tetraphase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One important component in determining the benefits and harms of medical interventions is the use of well-defined and reliable outcome assessments as endpoints in clinical trials. Improving endpoints can better define patient benefits, allowing more accurate assessment of drug efficacy and more informed benefit-vs-risk decisions; another potential plus is facilitating efficient trial design. Since our first report in 2012, 2 Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers ConsortiumProject Teams have continued to develop outcome assessments for potential uses as endpoints in registrational clinical trials of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. In addition, the teams have initiated similar work in the indications of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. This report provides an update on progress to date in these 4 diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available