4.0 Article

LONG-TERM CHANGES IN COMPOSITION OF BIRD COMMUNITIES AT AN UNDISTURBED SITE IN EASTERN ECUADOR

Journal

WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages 255-267

Publisher

WILSON ORNITHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1676/wils-128-02-255-267.1

Keywords

community composition; guild; long-term; lowland forest; species richness; tropical

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IBN 0235141]
  2. National Geographic Society [7113-01]
  3. Fulbright U.S. Scholars Program
  4. University of Missouri-St. Louis
  5. University of Florida

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bird populations vary both spatially and temporally with consequences for patterns of species richness and community composition. Many species of birds have declined in abundance over the last 14 years at a site in lowland Ecuador. Here, we examine impacts of those declines on composition of bird assemblages on two 100-ha plots in lowland forest at Tiputini Biodiversity Station, eastern Ecuador. Birds were sampled with mist nets (2001-2014) and by direct observations (2003-2006, 2009, 2010, 2013, and 2014). Species accumulation curves were similar on both plots but varied among years; rates of accumulation were particularly low in 2013, following declines in abundance of many species. Community composition differed between the two study plots based on species and guild composition; annual changes at the community level reflected changes in abundance of many species, particularly insectivores. Overall, assemblages of birds at this site in lowland Ecuador showed substantial variation over time and, to a lesser degree, between plots. If bird populations eventually return to levels seen in the early years of this study, we might expect community composition to resemble that of earlier years as well. Results demonstrate the value of long-term (> 10 years) studies on replicate plots to help understand dynamics of bird communities in lowland tropical forests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available