4.7 Article

Sensitive, reliable and easy-performed laboratory monitoring of eculizumab therapy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Journal

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 2, Pages 237-243

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.05.018

Keywords

Hemolytic uremic syndrome; Complement; Eculizumab; Personalized therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Kidney Foundation [13OI116, KFB 11.007, IP 10.22, KBSO 11.019, C09.2313]
  2. ERA-EDTA [ERA STF 138-2013, ERA LTF 203-2014]
  3. Research Council of Norway [204874/F20]
  4. Norwegian Council on Cardiovascular Disease (NCCD)
  5. Northern Norway Regional Health Authority [SPF914-10]
  6. Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  7. Odd Fellow Foundation (OFF)
  8. European Community [602699]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Complement C5 inhibitor eculizumab treatment in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is effective, but associated with high costs. Complement inhibition monitoring in these patients has not been standardized. In this study we evaluated novel functional assays for application in routine follow-up. We documented that the Wieslab (R) complement screen assay showed a sensitivity of 1-2% of C5 activity by adding purified C5 or normal human serum to a C5 deficient serum. All the patient samples obtained during the treatment course, were completely blocked for terminal complement pathway activity for up to four weeks after the eculizumab infusion. Levels of complexes between eculizumab and C5 were inversely correlated to the complement activity (p = 0.01). Moreover, titrating serum from eculizumab-treated patients into normal serum revealed that eculizumab was present in excess up to four weeks after infusion. Thus, we demonstrate sensitive, reliable and easy-performed assays which can be used to design individual eculizumab dosage regimens. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available