4.7 Article

Mesenchymal stem cells promote CD206 expression and phagocytic activity of macrophages through IL-6 in systemic lupus erythematosus

Journal

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 2, Pages 209-216

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.07.011

Keywords

Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Macrophage; IL-6

Categories

Funding

  1. Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project of China [81120108021]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273304, 81401349]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [021414340284]
  4. Intramural Research Program of NIH, NIDCR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs) show therapeutic effects on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Deficiency in functional polarization and phagocytosis in macrophages has been suggested in the pathogenesis of SLE. We found that macrophages from B6.MRL-Fas(lpr) mice exhibited lower level of CD206, the marker for alternatively activated macrophage (AAM, also called M2). In addition, the phagocytic activity of B6.MRL-Fas(lpr) macrophages was also decreased. UCMSC transplantation improved the proportion of CD206(+) macrophages and their phagocytic activity in B6.MRL-Fas(lpr) mice. Importantly, macrophages from SLE patients also showed lower expression of CD206 and reduced phagocytic activity, which were corrected by being co-cultured with UCMSCs in vitro and in SLE patients receiving UCMSC transplantation. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that IL-6 was required for the up-regulation of CD206 expression and phagocytic activity of UCMSC-treated SLE macrophages. Our results indicate that UCMSCs alleviate SLE through promoting CD206 expression and phagocytic activity of macrophages in an IL-6 dependent manner. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available