4.1 Article

Growth Analysis of Cotton in Competition with Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti)

Journal

WEED TECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 123-136

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-15-00050.1

Keywords

Fiber properties; productive growth; seed cotton yield; seed production; weed biomass

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Public Welfare Research Institutes, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Field experiments were conducted in 2013 and 2014 to determine the influence of velvetleaf densities of 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 plants m(-1) of row on cotton growth and yield. The relationship between velvetleaf density and seed cotton yield was described by the hyperbolic decay regression model, which estimated that a density of 0.44 to 0.48 velvetleaf m(-1) of row would result in a seed cotton yield loss of 50%. Velvetleaf remained taller and thicker than cotton throughout the growing season. Both cotton height and stem diameter reduced with increasing velvetleaf density. Moreover, velvetleaf interference delayed cotton maturity, especially at velvetleaf densities of 1 to 8 plants m(-1) of row, and cotton boll number and weight, seed numbers per boll, and lint percentage were also reduced. Fiber quality was not influenced by weed density when analyzed over 2 yr; however, fiber length uniformity and micronaire were adversely affected in 2014. Velvetleaf intraspecific competition resulted in density-dependent effects on weed biomass, ranging from 97 to 204 g plant(-1) dry weight. Velvetleaf seed production per plant or per square meter was indicated by a logarithmic response. At a density of 1 plant m(-1) of cotton row, velvetleaf produced approximately 20,000 seeds m(-2). The adverse impact of velvetleaf on cotton growth and development identified in this study have indicated the need for effective management of this species when the weed density is greater than 0.25 to 0.5 plant m(-1) of row and before the weed seed maturity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available