4.7 Article

Effect of particle size on erosion characteristics

Journal

WEAR
Volume 348, Issue -, Pages 126-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.12.003

Keywords

Erosion; Particle size; Erosion mechanism; Erosion profiles; Erosion rate

Funding

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore (A*STAR) [R-265-000-412-305]
  2. Temasek Laboratories, National University of Singapore [R-394-000-081-232]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When entrained into a carrier flow, such as liquid or gas, sand particles are able to interact with material surfaces strongly, which may cause serious erosion damage. How particle size affects the erosion characteristics, such as erosion pattern, erosion rate, erosion mechanism and erosion profile remains largely unexplored. In this study, we perform both experiments and numerical simulations to study the effects of particle size on those factors. In the experimental setup, a wet erosion test-rig is used, in which the flow speed of a mixture of sand particles and water is set to be 30 m/s and the different average sand particle sizes of 50, 80, 150, 350, 450 and 700 pm are taken. The experimental results show that there is a transition in the erosion profile from a W shape to a U shape with increasing the sand particle size. The sample surface profiles obtained from the experiments are then used to create geometry models for our numerical simulations. The simulation results are in good agreement with experimental measurements in terms of erosion rate and erosion pattern. Importantly, the simulations show that the larger sand particles able to dig deeper into the sample surface than smaller particles, providing a cogent explanation for the observed transition. The present work highlights the important role of particle size in affecting the erosion pattern, erosion rate, erosion mechanism and eroded profile. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available