4.7 Article

Solid particle erosion of standard and advanced thermal barrier coatings

Journal

WEAR
Volume 348, Issue -, Pages 43-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.10.021

Keywords

Solid particle erosion; Thermal spray coatings; High temperature; Electron microscopy

Funding

  1. EU-FP7 Programme on hydrogen-rich syngas for IGCC (H2-IGCC) [239349]
  2. Research Fund for the Italian Electrical System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The state-of-the-art of the thermal barrier coatings (TBCs), used to protect hot path components from combustion gases, is represented by yttria (partially) stabilized zirconia (YPSZ). Combustion and cooling technology improvements in combination with higher turbine inlet temperature imply that the standard YSZ approaches have certain limitations due to sintering and phase transformations at elevated temperatures. Moreover under high thermal loading early failure of the coating occurs due to attack by calcium-magnesium-alumino-silicate (CMAS) deposits inducing cracking, spallation and delamination of the coating. Alternative refractory materials development, with higher performances than YSZ, was the objective of the UE project H2IGCC: within this project the erosion resistance of porous, dense segmented YPSZ TBCs and innovative TBCs, featured with a bilayer structure, has been tested at impingement angles of 30 and 90, representative for particle impingement on trailing and leading edges of gas turbine blades and vanes, respectively. Alumina powders with grain size representative of sand and fly ashes, respectively were chosen as the erodent. A better erosion resistance of dense segmented TBCs regardless of experimental conditions was observed, whereas one of the new bilayer coating, due to its peculiar micro-structure, showed a very interesting erosion resistance, at least with fine erosion particles. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available