4.7 Article

Effects of rock water content on CERCHAR Abrasivity Index

Journal

WEAR
Volume 368, Issue -, Pages 132-145

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2016.09.007

Keywords

CERCHAR Abrasivity Index (CAI); Quartz content (QC); Equivalent quartz content (EQC); Schimazek's F-value; Rock abrasivity index (RAI); Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cerchar Abrasivity Index (CAI) has been commonly used to represent rock abrasion for estimation of tool wear in rock excavation applications. This test is a simple and effective measure of rock abrasion but operating parameters can impact its results. This paper focuses on the influence of water saturation on CAI values based on laboratory testing of 33 sedimentary rock units collected from different regions of Pakistan. The tests include CAI measurements as well as engineering rock properties on both dry and saturated rocks. It was found that overall 79% of CERCHAR abrasivity index values measured on saturated rock surfaces CAI(sat) were less than the CERCHAR abrasivity index values measured on dry rock surfaces CAI(dry). Meanwhile, 52% of CAI(sat) values showed significant reduction from CAI(dry) values in the statistical analysis of CAI results with significance level of 15% (alpha=0.15). Regression analysis was used to correlate CAlsat values with CAI(dry), normally measured in CERCHAR testing. The proposed formula can be used to estimate CAI(sat) from result of laboratory testing where CAI reported is often CAI(dry). This could lead into more accurate, estimation of tool wear and related adjustments when CAI is used for estimation of tool wear when excavation is done under wet conditions. Multiple regression was also used to establish a predictive model of CAI(sat) with petrographical, wear indices and geotechnical rock properties of saturated rock samples. In addition, the validity of correlations of CAI with rock properties that are already published was evaldated. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available