4.5 Article

Nitrogen removal and power generation from treated municipal wastewater by its circulated irrigation for resource-saving rice cultivation

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages 898-907

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.572

Keywords

circulated irrigation; microbial fuel cell; municipal wastewater; nitrogen removal; power generation; rice fodder

Funding

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism (MLIT) of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims at improving the performance of the cultivating system of rice for animal feed with circulated irrigation of treated municipal wastewater by applying a larger amount of wastewater, as well as adding a microbial fuel cell (MFC) to the system. The results of bench-scale experiments indicate that this modification has increased the rice yield, achieving the target for the rice cultivar used in the experiment. In addition, an assessment of protein content of the harvested rice showed that the value of the rice as animal fodder has improved. Compared with normal one-way irrigation, circulated irrigation significantly enhanced the plant growth and rice production. The direction of the irrigation (bottom-to-top or top-to-bottom) in the soil layer had no significant effect. This modified system demonstrated > 96% for nitrogen removal from the treated wastewater used for the irrigation, with approximately 40% of the nitrogen being used for rice plant growth. The MFC installed in the system facilitated power generation comparable with that reported for normal paddy fields. The power generation appeared to be enhanced by bottom-to-top irrigation, which could provide organic-rich treated wastewater directly to the bacterial community living on the anode of the MFC set in the soil layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available