4.7 Article

Debates-Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: Why stochastic modeling has not yet permeated into practitioners?

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 12, Pages 9246-9258

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016WR019302

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MINECO/FEDER [CGL2015-69768-R]
  2. MINECO
  3. UE [PCIN-2015-248]
  4. ICREA Academia Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We address modern topics of stochastic hydrogeology from their potential relevance to real modeling efforts at the field scale. While the topics of stochastic hydrogeology and numerical modeling have become routine in hydrogeological studies, nondeterministic models have not yet permeated into practitioners. We point out a number of limitations of stochastic modeling when applied to real applications and comment on the reasons why stochastic models fail to become an attractive alternative for practitioners. We specifically separate issues corresponding to flow, conservative transport, and reactive transport. The different topics addressed are emphasis on process modeling, need for upscaling parameters and governing equations, relevance of properly accounting for detailed geological architecture in hydrogeological modeling, and specific challenges of reactive transport. We end up by concluding that the main responsible for nondeterministic models having not yet permeated in industry can be fully attributed to researchers in stochastic hydrogeology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available