4.7 Article

Identification and Analysis of Drought Propagation of Groundwater During Past and Future Periods

Journal

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 109-125

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1513-5

Keywords

Hydraulic diffusivity; Groundwater drought; Propagation drought; SGI index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of the characteristics and propagation behaviors of groundwater drought at different aquifer sites during past and future periods needs a proper understanding regarding its relation with meteorological droughts. Use of a robust technique of modeling (stochastic models) allowed groundwater level and precipitation to be forecasted and then the droughts were computed and analyzed using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). In this research, Aleshtar Plain was selected as a case study. Analysis in this region was carried out by hierarchy and K-means clustering (5 clusters), because of the regional investigation of groundwater drought and large number of boreholes. The performance results of models showed that best forecasting models in cluster 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were Auto-Regressive (AR)(1), AR(2), Moving Average (MA)(2), Mixed Autoregressive-Moving Average (ARMA)(2,2) and AR(2), respectively. Furthermore, the most appropriate model for precipitation within the study plain was ARMA(1, 2). Investigation of the relationship between meteorological and groundwater drought indicated that the strongest correlation between two types of droughts was for clusters 4 and 1 with a correlation coefficient of 0.76 and 0.63, respectively. Also, the lowest correlation was for cluster 2 with a correlation coefficient of 0.51. The results of cumulative periods related to the maximum correlation between SPI and Standardized Groundwater Level Index (SGI) showed that clusters 1 to 3 corresponded with cumulative 24-month periods of SPI and this magnitude for clusters 4 and 5 were 18 and 12 months, respectively. Moreover, results of maximum drought severity showed there was low variability between clusters considering the extreme droughts (SGI <= -2) during the study period. For the future period, drought severity results showed that groundwater drought of 2019 may happen with moderate value in cluster 5, severe values in clusters 2, 1 and 4, respectively, and extreme value in cluster 3. Hydrogeological evidence of the sites and results of autocorrelation structure of SGI series confirmed the time taken by meteorological drought for propagation into groundwater. Furthermore, results showed that the aquifer is controlled more by hydraulic diffusivity factor. so it would be expected that drought propagation time into groundwater would be long for the Western part and relatively short for sites located in the East, South tending to center and partially north of the aquifer. In general, these results represent an early warning system for groundwater drought preparation and mitigation of its impacts in a future time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available