4.8 Article

Evaluation of virus removal efficiency of coagulation-sedimentation and rapid sand filtration processes in a drinking water treatment plant in Bangkok, Thailand

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 84-94

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.012

Keywords

Virus removal; Pepper mild mottle virus; JC polyomavirus; Coagulation-sedimentation; Rapid sand filtration; Risk management

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [25249074]
  2. Health Labour Sciences Research Grant by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan [H25-Kenki-Ippan-007, H28-Kenki-Ippan-005]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25249074] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to properly assess and manage the risk of infection by enteric viruses in tap water, virus removal efficiency should be evaluated quantitatively for individual processes in actual drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs); however, there have been only a few studies due to technical difficulties in quantifying low virus concentration in water samples. In this study, the removal efficiency of indigenous viruses was evaluated for coagulation-sedimentation (CS) and rapid sand filtration (RSF) processes in a DWTP in Bangkok, Thailand by measuring the concentration of viruses before and after treatment processes using real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Water samples were collected and concentrated from raw source water, after CS, and after RSF, and inhibitory substances in water samples were reduced by use of a hydrophobic resin (DAX-8). Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and JC polyomavirus (JC PyV) were found to be highly prevalent in raw waters, with concentrations of 10(2.88 +/- 0.35) and 10(3.06) (+/- 0.42) copies/L (geometric mean +/- S.D.), respectively. Step-wise removal efficiencies were calculated for individual processes, with some variation observed between wet and dry seasons. During the wet season, PMMoV was removed less by CS and more by RSF on average (0.40 log(10) vs 1.26 log(10), respectively), while the reverse was true for JC PyV (1.91 log(10) vs 0.49 log(10), respectively). Both viruses were removed similarly during the dry season, with CS removing the most virus (PMMoV, 1.61 log(10) and 0.78 log(10); JC PyV, 1.70 log(10), and 0.59 log(10); CS and RSF, respectively). These differences between seasons were potentially due to variations in raw water quality and the characteristics of the viruses themselves. These results suggest that PMMoV and JC PyV, which are more prevalent in environmental waters than the other enteric viruses evaluated in this study, could be useful in determining viral fate for the risk management of viruses in water treatment processes in actual full-scale DWTPs. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available