4.8 Article

Determination of the fractions of syntrophically oxidized acetate in a mesophilic methanogenic reactor through an 12C and 13C isotope-based kinetic model

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 362-373

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.038

Keywords

Syntrophic acetate oxidation; Mathematical model; Stable carbon isotopes; Anaerobic biofilm; Carbon isotope fractionation

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation DFG [LU 1167/5-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to accurately describe the carbon flow in anaerobic digestion processes, this work investigates the acetate degradation pathways through the use of stable carbon isotope analysis and a mathematical model. Batch assays using labeled C-13 acetate were employed to distinguish the acetate consumption through methanogenic Archaea and acetate-oxidizing Bacteria. Suspended and sessile biomass, with over 400 days of retention time, from a mesophilic (36.5 degrees C) upflow anaerobic filter was used as inocula in these assays. A three-process model for acetoclastic methanogenesis and syntrophic acetate oxidation (SAO) was developed to allow for a precise quantification of the SAO contribution. The model distinguishes carbon atoms in light and heavy isotopes, C-12 and C-13, respectively, which permitted the simulation of the isotope ratios variation in addition to gas production, gas composition and acetate concentrations. The model indicated oxidized fractions of acetate between 7 and 18%. Due to the low free ammonia inhibition potential for the acetoclastic methanogens in these assays these findings point to the biomass retention times as a driven factor for the SAO pathway. The isotope-based kinetic model developed here also describes the delta C-13 variations in unlabeled assays accurately and has the potential to determine biological C-13 fractionation factors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available