4.6 Article

Degradation of Microcystins from Microcystis aeruginosa by 185-nm UV Irradiation

Journal

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
Volume 227, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-016-2805-3

Keywords

Microcystins; Immersion; Irradiation; 185 nm UV; Degradation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50809037]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Team in University [IRT13078]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment [ESK201601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microcystins (MCs) are toxic compounds produced by cyanobacteria in eutrophicate water environment and threaten the drinking water quality which often leads to serious sicknesses. MCs are difficult to be removed in water treatment when the concentration is very lowbut still harmful. When theMC concentration is low (mu g/L), filter or some conventional chemical does not work, but UV can keep removing it to a lower level by some active groups. Herein, 185-nmUVirradiation in an immersing mode was used to remove MCs. Compared with the normal radiation mode, the immersing mode showed a remarkable degradation rate ofMCs and a greater removal efficiency than the direct radiation. Radicals of center dot H and center dot OH were produced and strengthened the removal rate, after H2O absorbed 185 nm photons. Three important factors of pH value, initial concentration, and aeration capacity were investigated. When pH was less than 7, a better removal rate by center dot H was found, due to the main path ofMC degradation and Adda strain removal. When the initial concentration increased, the MC removal ratio decreased because HO center dot formed near the lamp surface and degradedMCmolecules fast. When the aeration capacity improved, theMCremoval ratio for the presence of air enforced reaction of dissolved oxygen with hydrated electrons and hydrogen atoms produced in the radiolysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available