4.7 Article

An environmental benign process for cobalt and lithium recovery from spent lithium-ion batteries by mechanochemical approach

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 239-244

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.006

Keywords

Spent lithium-ion batteries; Mechanochemical approach; Lithium cobalt oxide; EDTA; Metal recovery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477151, 51278485]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB05050200]
  3. Science Promotion Program of Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CAS [YSW2013B05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current study, an environmental benign process namely mechanocheinical approach was developed for cobalt and lithium recovery from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The main merit of the process was that neither corrosive acid nor strong oxidant was applied. In the proposed process, lithium cobalt oxide (obtained from spent LIBs) was firstly co-grinded with various additives in a hermetic ball milling system, then Co and Li could be easily recovered by a water leaching procedure. It was found that EDTA was the most suitable co-grinding reagent, and 98% of Co and 99% of Li were respectively recovered under optimum conditions: LiCoO2 to EDTA mass ratio 1:4, milling time 4 h, rotary speed 600 r/min and ball-to-powder mass ratio 80:1, respectively. Mechanisms study implied that lone pair electrons provided by two nitrogen atoms and four hydroxyl oxygen atoms of EDTA could enter the empty orbit of Co and Li by solid-solid reaction, thus forming stable and water-soluble metal chelates Li-EDTA and Co-EDTA. Moreover, the separation of Co and Li could be achieved through a chemical precipitation approach. This study provides a high efficiency and environmentally friendly process for Co and Li recovery from spent LIBs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available