4.4 Article

A comparative study of the antibacterial mechanisms of silver ion and silver nanoparticles by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Journal

VIBRATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 112-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2016.04.007

Keywords

Antibacterial; FTIR spectroscopy; Silver; Silver ion; Silver nanoparticles; Escherichia coli.

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21075027]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2011201082, B2016201034]
  3. Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [211014]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20121301110003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we performed the first comparative study of the antibacterial mechanisms of silver ion (Ag+) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on Escherichia coli (E. coli) using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Through a thorough analysis of the FTIR spectra of E. coli after silver treatment in the spectral regions corresponding to thiol group, protein, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and DNA, we were able to reveal a multifaceted antibacterial mechanism of silver at the molecular level for both Ag+ and AgNPs. Features of such mechanism include: (1) silver complexes with thiol group; (2) silver induces protein misfolding; (3) silver causes loss of LPS from bacterial membrane; (4) silver changes the overall conformation of DNA. Despite the similarities between Ag+ and AgNPs with respect to their antibacterial mechanisms, we further revealed that Ag+ and AgNPs display quite different kinetics for silver-thiol complexation and loss of LPS, with Ag+ displaying fast kinetics and AgNPs displaying slow kinetics. At last, we proposed a hypothesis to interpret the observed different behaviors between Ag+ and AgNPs when interacting with E. coli. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available