4.7 Article

A canine-specific probiotic product in treating acute or intermittent diarrhea in dogs: A double-blind placebo-controlled efficacy study

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages 122-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.11.015

Keywords

Canine diarrhea; Enteric pathogens; Probiotics; Lactobacillus sp.; Clostridium perfringens; Enterococcus faecium

Funding

  1. Seneca Foundation
  2. Regional Agency of Science and Technology of the Region of Murcia
  3. Education and Universities Council - Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A double-blind placebo-controlled intervention study on 60 dogs recruited from a pool of canine patients visiting a veterinary practice and diagnosed with acute diarrhea was conducted. The dogs received in randomized manner either a sour-milk product containing three canine-derived Lactobacillus sp. probiotics in combination of Lactobacillus fermentum VET 9A, L. rhamnosus VET 16A, and L plantarum VET 14A (2 x 109cfuirn1), or placebo. Stool consistency, general well-being, and the numbers of specific pathogens in stool samples were analyzed. Our results demonstrated that the treatment with the study sour-milk product had a normalizing effect on canine stool consistency. The treatment also enhanced the well-being of the pet by maintaining appetite and may reduce vomiting. In addition, the concentrations of Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus faecium, which typically increase during diarrhea episodes in dogs, were decreased in probiotic group feces when compared with the placebo group. Taken together, the sour-milk with the specific probiotic combination had a normalizing effect on acute diarrhea in dogs which was associated with decreased numbers of potential pathogens in the feces of probiotic-treated dogs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available