4.3 Article

NK cells are intrinsically functional in pigs with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) caused by spontaneous mutations in the Artemis gene

Journal

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.04.008

Keywords

Natural killer; NK cells; SCID; Pig; Innate immunity; Artemis; Perforin

Funding

  1. Iowa State University Office of Vice President for Research
  2. USDA National Needs Fellowship Grant [2012-38420-19286]
  3. NIH [1R24OD019813-01]
  4. ARS [911988, ARS-0430363] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have identified Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) in a line of Yorkshire pigs at Iowa State University. These SCID pigs lack B-cells and T-cells, but possess Natural Killer (NK) cells. This SCID phenotype is caused by recessive mutations in the Artemis gene. Interestingly, two human tumor cell lines, PANC-1 and A375-SM, survived after injection into these SCID pigs, but, as we demonstrate here, these cells, as well as K562 tumor cells, can be lysed in vitro by NK cells from SCID and non-SCID pigs. NK cells from both SCID and non-SCID pigs required activation in vitro with either recombinant human IL-2 or the combination of recombinant porcine IL-12 and IL-18 to kill tumor targets. We also showed that SCID NK cells could be activated to produce perforin, and perforin production was greatly enhanced in NK cells from both SCID and non-SCID pigs after IL-2 cytokine treatment. While CD16+, CD172- NK cells constituted an average of only 4% in non-SCID pigs, NK cells averaged 27% of the peripheral blood mononuclear cell population in SCID pigs. We found no significant differences in killing activity per NK cell between SCID and non-SCID pigs. We conclude that survival of human cancer cells in these SOD pigs is not due to an intrinsic defect in NK cell killing ability. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available