4.4 Article

Bone density and microarchitecture in endogenous hypercortisolism

Journal

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages 468-474

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.12812

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Osteoporosis is a serious and underestimated complication of endogenous hypercortisolism that results in an increased risk of fractures, even in patients with normal or slightly decreased bone mineral density (BMD). Alterations in bone microarchitecture, a very important component of bone quality, may explain bone fragility. The aim of this study was to investigate bone density and microarchitecture in a cohort of patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS). Design Cross-sectional study. Patients Thirty patients with endogenous active CS and fifty-one age-, sex-and body mass index-matched controls were included. Measurements Participants were studied for areal BMD (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), total femur (TF) and radius (33%), and for volumetric bone density (vBMD) and structure using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) of the distal radius and distal tibia. Results Patients with active CS exhibited lower areal BMD and Z-score values in the LS, FN and TF (P < 0.003 for all comparisons). At HR-pQCT, the patients with CS also had lower cortical area (P = 0.009 at the radius and P = 0.002 at the tibia), lower cortical thickness (P = 0.02 at the radius and P = 0.002 at the tibia), lower cortical density (P = 0.008 at the tibia) and lower total vBMD (P = 0.002 at the tibia). After the exclusion of hypogonadal individuals, the patients with CS maintained the same microarchitectural and densitometric alterations described above. Conclusions Endogenous hypercortisolism has deleterious effects on bone, especially on cortical bone microstructure. These effects seem to be a more important determinant of bone impairment than gonadal status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available