4.5 Article

Commercial vaccines provide limited protection to NADC30-like PRRSV infection

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 34, Issue 46, Pages 5540-5545

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.09.048

Keywords

NADC30-like PRRSV; Commercial PRRSV vaccines; Vaccine efficacy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31490601]
  2. Luoyang Heluo Talent Plan
  3. Technology Foundation for Selected Overseas Chinese Scholar
  4. Talents Plan for Scientific and Technological Innovation in Henan Province [144200510002]
  5. Science and Technology Innovation team in Henan Province [C20130005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NADC30-like PRRSV has been recently reported and became endemic in vaccinated pig herds in China. The outbreaks of disease in vaccinated pigs indicated the inefficacy of commercial PRRSV vaccines. In this study, five commercial PRRSV vaccines that have been widely used in China were used to evaluate the efficacy to a NADC30-like PRRSV infection. The vaccinated pigs were challenged with HNjz15, a NADC30-like PRRSV at 28 days post vaccination. Compared to unvaccinated pigs, the vaccinated pigs clinically shortened the period of fever with less pig numbers of clinical manifestations and had improved body weight gain at the end of the study. However, the vaccinated pigs developed viremia with similar kinetics and suffered pathological lesions in lung and lymphoid tissues as the unvaccinated pigs. The virus load in tonsil, lung and lymph nodes detected by immunohistochemistry staining in vaccinated pigs was also similar to that in unvaccinated pigs which indicated the inability of vaccination to eradicate the virus from tissues of vaccinated pigs. Therefore, the above results suggested current commercial PRRSV vaccines could not provide complete protection to the NADC30-like PRRSV infection. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available