4.4 Article

Combined Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Validation Study in a Biopsy-naive Patient Population

Journal

UROLOGY
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 125-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.035

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research
  2. NIH Center for Interventional Oncology
  3. NIH
  4. Pfizer Inc.
  5. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  6. Newport Foundation
  7. American Association for Dental Research
  8. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  9. Colgate-Palmolive Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE To validate the use of biparametric (T2- and diffusion-weighted) magnetic resonance imaging (B-MRI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or PSA density (PSAD) in a biopsy-naive cohort at risk for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS All patients (n = 59) underwent PSA screening and digital rectal exam prior to a B-MRI followed by MRI or transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided targeted biopsy. Previously reported composite formulas incorporating screen positive lesions (SPL) on B-MRI and PSA or PSAD were developed to maximize PCa detection. For PSA, a patient was considered screen positive if PSA level + 6 x (the number of SPL) > 14. For PSAD, screening was positive if PSAD x 14 + (the number of SPL) > 4.25. These schemes were employed in this new test set to validate the initial formulas. Performance assessment of these formulas was determined for all cancer detection and for tumors with Gleason >= 3 + 4. RESULTS Screen positive lesions on B-MRI had the highest sensitivity (95.5%) and negative predictive value of 71.4% compared with PSA and PSAD. B-MRI significantly improved sensitivity (43.2-72.7%, P = .0002) when combined with PSAD. The negative predictive value of PSA increased with B-MRI, achieving 91.7% for B-MRI and PSA for Gleason >= 3 + 4. Overall accuracies of the composite equations were 81.4% (B-MRI and PSA) and 78.0% (B-MRI and PSAD). CONCLUSION Validation with a biopsy-naive cohort demonstrates the parameter SPL performed better than PSA or PSAD alone in accurately detecting PCa. The combined use of B-MRI, PSA, and PSAD resulted in improved accuracy for detecting clinically significant PCa. 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available