4.6 Review

High sensitivity cardiac troponin assays in the clinical laboratories

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 635-652

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0565

Keywords

acute myocardial infarction; cardiac troponin I; cardiac troponin T; diagnosis; high sensitivity assay; prognosis; ultrasensitive assay

Funding

  1. T2 Biosystems
  2. Quanterix
  3. Abbott
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Beckman Coulter
  6. Daiichi Sankyo
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Merck
  9. Roche Diagnostics
  10. Takeda
  11. Waters Technologies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunoassays measuring cardiac troponins I or T have become firmly established as critical tools for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction. While most contemporary assays provide adequate diagnostic performance, the increased sensitivity and precision of the new, high sensitivity assays that have already been introduced into clinical practice, provide the potential to further shorten intervals between blood draws or the time needed to detect the first significant troponin elevation. In addition to the relatively modest benefits at the diagnostic end, the high sensitivity assays and the investigational ultrasensitive cardiac troponin assays offer improvements for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events, development of heart failure or transition to end-stage kidney disease. These novel high sensitivity assays can measure troponin concentrations in 50%-100% of healthy individuals and therefore allow for the distribution of troponin values within a healthy cohort to be measured, patient's baseline troponin levels to be monitored, and clinicians to be alerted of deteriorating cardiorenal conditions. We envisage that the high sensitivity assays will become important tools for predicting each patient's risk of future adverse events and for guiding and monitoring corresponding adjustments of preventative therapeutic interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available