Journal
UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages 295-298Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2016.1189470
Keywords
Ethics; justice; medicalization; preconception genetic carrier testing; reproductive autonomy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Population-based preconception genetic carrier screening programmes (PCS) with expanded panels are currently being developed in the Netherlands. This form of genetic screening for recessive traits differs from other forms of genetic testing and screening in that it is offered to persons not known to have an increased risk of being carriers of genetic traits for severe recessive diseases and in that they include tests for a large number of traits, potentially several hundred. This raises several ethical issues around justice, consequences, and autonomy. It will be argued that most of these ethical problems call for cautious reflection when setting up PCS and similar programmes within preconception care. It is moreover argued that it is ethically problematic to have an official aim and failing to mention possibly legitimate public aims that actually drive the development of PCS.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available