4.5 Article

MICROVASCULAR INJURY AND PERFUSION CHANGES INDUCED BY ULTRASOUND AND MICROBUBBLES IN A MACHINE-PERFUSED PIG LIVER

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 2676-2686

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.025

Keywords

Sonoporation; Extravasation; Machine-perfused pig liver; Drug delivery; Vessel poration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Localized drug delivery and uptake can benefit from the combined action of ultrasound and microbubbles at a specific site. Some of the possible mechanisms suggested are vessel poration and/or cell poration, but the exact acoustic parameters that trigger those phenomena remain unknown. Ex vivo machine perfusion of human-sized organs is a technique that provides an ideal environment for pre-clinical investigations with high physiologic relevance not possible with in vitro experiments. In this work, ex vivo machine-perfused pig livers were combined with an image-guided therapy system to investigate microvascular flow changes caused by the interaction of ultrasound-driven microbubbles with the vasculature. The effects of acoustic pressure (1.7-4 MPa peak negative pressures) and number of cycles (1000 or 20 cycles) were examined. Perfusion changes caused by the action of ultrasound on microbubbles in the microcirculation were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and used as a metric of the extent of vessel perforation, thus, extravasation. Areas that were exposed to peak negative pressures above 1.7 MPa underwent a detectable and irreversible perfusion change. Complete devascularization of the area exposed to ultrasound was observed at much larger acoustic pressures (similar to 4 MPa). Shorter acoustic pulses (20 cycles) produced markedly fewer perfusion changes than longer pulses (1000 cycles) under the same acoustic amplitude exposure. (C) 2016World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available