4.7 Article

Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from wild garlic (Allium ursinum L.)

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 502-511

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.11.005

Keywords

Ultrasound-assisted extraction; Allium ursinum; Total phenols; Total flavonoids; Antioxidant activity; Response surface methodology

Funding

  1. Fructus d.o.o., Backa Palanka, Serbia
  2. Visegrad/V4EaP Scholarship [51400735]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasound-assisted extraction was used for extraction of bioactive compounds and for production of Allium ursinum liquid extract. The experiments were carried out according to tree level, four variables, face-centered cubic experimental design (FDC) combined with response surface methodology (RSM). Temperature (from 40 to 80 degrees C), ethanol concentration (from 30% to 70%), extraction time (from 40 to 80 min) and ultrasonic power (from 19.2 to 38.4 W/L) were investigated as independent variables in order to obtain the optimal conditions for extraction and to maximize the yield of total phenols (TP), flavonoids (TF) and antioxidant activity of obtained extracts. Experimental results were fitted to the second order polynomial model where multiple regression and analysis of variance were used to determine the fitness of the model and optimal condition for investigated responses. The predicted values of the TP (1.60 g GAE/100 g DW), TF (0.35 g CE/100 g DW), antioxidant activity, IC50 (0.71 mg/ml) and EY (38.1%) were determined at the optimal conditions for ultrasound assisted extraction: 80 degrees C temperature, 70% ethanol, 79.8 min and 20.06 W/L ultrasonic power. The predicted results matched well with the experimental results obtained using optimal extraction conditions which validated the RSM model with a good correlation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available