4.4 Article

Dose-rate-dependent damage of cerium dioxide in the scanning transmission electron microscope

Journal

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.002

Keywords

Scanning transmission electron microscopy; Point defects; Beam damage; Cerium dioxide

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Council Research Associateship Award at the National Institute of Standards and Technology
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research under AFOSR Award [FA9550-14-1-0304]
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1308644]
  4. CCI Center for Nanostructured Electronic Materials [CHE-1038015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Beam damage caused by energetic electrons in the transmission electron microscope is a fundamental constraint limiting the collection of artifact-free information. Through understanding the influence of the electron beam, experimental routines may be adjusted to improve the data collection process. Investigations of CeO2 indicate that there is not a critical dose required for the accumulation of electron beam damage. Instead, measurements using annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy loss spectroscopy demonstrate that the onset of measurable damage occurs when a critical dose rate is exceeded. The mechanism behind this phenomenon is that oxygen vacancies created by exposure to a 300 keV electron beam are actively annihilated as the sample re-oxidizes in the microscope environment. As a result, only when the rate of vacancy creation exceeds the recovery rate will beam damage begin to accumulate. This observation suggests that dose-intensive experiments can be accomplished without disrupting the native structure of the sample when executed using dose rates below the appropriate threshold. Furthermore, the presence of an encapsulating carbonaceous layer inhibits processes that cause beam damage, markedly increasing the dose rate threshold for the accumulation of damage. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available